From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Aug 10 15:02:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA23663 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 10 Aug 1996 15:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cleese.nas.com (root@cleese.nas.com [198.182.207.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA23636 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 1996 15:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archer.wagill.com(really [198.182.208.145]) by cleese.nas.com via sendmail with smtp id for ; Sat, 10 Aug 1996 15:02:33 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #3 built 1996-Jul-12) Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19960810220245.006c4350@mail.nas.com> X-Sender: wagill@mail.nas.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 15:02:45 -0700 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Bill Subject: ircd recompile Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I had to recompile ircd (in order to disable operator password encryption, and enable operator kills). I did a make on the ircd directory itself (where the server sources are). After the make was done, I noticed that the ircd executable was five times larger in size than the one originally built when I installed the entire IRC 2.8.21 port. Although ircd seems to be running fine, I can't help wondering why the executable grew five fold. Any ideas? Thanks. - Bill. ________________________________________________________________________ William A. Gill Interactive Voice Response WAGILL COMPUTING Electronic Data Interchange 814 Lakeway Drive, Suite 280 PowerBuilder/SQL Windows RAD Bellingham, Washington 98226-6219, USA Internet, Unix, C, TCP/IP (360) 738-1278 IBM 360/370 Assembler http://www.wagill.com Systems Development Life Cycle