Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 15:54:34 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu Cc: FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcl Message-ID: <199706242254.PAA14518@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970624183615.22918A-100000@Journey2.mat.net> (message from Chuck Robey on Tue, 24 Jun 1997 18:38:56 -0400 (EDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Well, I was thinking about all the stuff done to allow different versions * of tcl and tk to coexist. In my opinion, they break the method that * tcl/tk uses to determine things itself. Yes, but that doesn't have anything to do with a certain version of tcl being in /usr. With tcl-7.5/7.6 and tk-4.1/4.2 as well as their Japanese counterparts, we'll still have the same problem. (Is 8.0 out of alpha yet?) * I agree, tk wouldn't be added. I'd be happy yanking tcl out of the * sources. I guess I just didn't want to crosspost on this, yet. I might * bring it up on hackers, later. I don't think there are any scripts in tcl * that couldn't be in perl. No comment on that from me. ;) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706242254.PAA14518>