From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jun 24 15:55:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA12097
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 15:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA12086
          for <FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 15:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) id PAA14518; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 15:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 15:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706242254.PAA14518@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu
CC: FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970624183615.22918A-100000@Journey2.mat.net> (message from Chuck Robey on Tue, 24 Jun 1997 18:38:56 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: tcl
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Well, I was thinking about all the stuff done to allow different versions
 * of tcl and tk to coexist.  In my opinion, they break the method that
 * tcl/tk uses to determine things itself.

Yes, but that doesn't have anything to do with a certain version of
tcl being in /usr.  With tcl-7.5/7.6 and tk-4.1/4.2 as well as their
Japanese counterparts, we'll still have the same problem.  (Is 8.0 out 
of alpha yet?)

 * I agree, tk wouldn't be added.  I'd be happy yanking tcl out of the
 * sources.  I guess I just didn't want to crosspost on this, yet.  I might
 * bring it up on hackers, later.  I don't think there are any scripts in tcl
 * that couldn't be in perl.

No comment on that from me. ;)

Satoshi