From owner-cvs-all Wed Jan 23 20:45:51 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB02C37B402; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 20:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id 892DB9B08; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 23:45:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 23:45:22 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Steve Price Cc: Maxim Sobolev , Robert Watson , "David E. O'Brien" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, security-officer@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync Makefile ports/net/rsync/files patch-251-secfix Message-ID: <20020123234522.U18609@squall.waterspout.com> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Steve Price , Maxim Sobolev , Robert Watson , "David E. O'Brien" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, security-officer@FreeBSD.org References: <1011831273.264.49.camel@notebook> <20020123195726.T18609@squall.waterspout.com> <20020123193240.M72686@bsd.havk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020123193240.M72686@bsd.havk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:32:40PM -0600, Steve Price wrote: > Actually if I catch things before the first phase is complete I > have a little lattitude in making changes. Yes it requires some > elbow grease but in this case not having an rsync or having one > with a known security hole just wasn't going to cut it. rsync is > way too popular a package to have a release go out without it if > we can help it. > > I've slid the tag and chanted the magic words and the release > will go out with the recently patched rsync. OK, sounds good to me. > In an attempt to stave off your next reply, yes I probably should > have discussed this with the rest of portmgr first. However the > phase one build was almost complete so I made a quick judgement > call with my portmgr, re, and package building hats on. If you'd > like to discuss it further, please let's take this discussion to > portmgr@ where it belongs. No discussion necessary, I was only opposed to the idea because I didn't know it could be done cleanly... -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message