Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 23:45:22 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Steve Price <steve@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, security-officer@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync Makefile ports/net/rsync/files patch-251-secfix Message-ID: <20020123234522.U18609@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <20020123193240.M72686@bsd.havk.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020123190443.49432B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <1011831273.264.49.camel@notebook> <20020123195726.T18609@squall.waterspout.com> <20020123193240.M72686@bsd.havk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:32:40PM -0600, Steve Price wrote: > Actually if I catch things before the first phase is complete I > have a little lattitude in making changes. Yes it requires some > elbow grease but in this case not having an rsync or having one > with a known security hole just wasn't going to cut it. rsync is > way too popular a package to have a release go out without it if > we can help it. > > I've slid the tag and chanted the magic words and the release > will go out with the recently patched rsync. OK, sounds good to me. > In an attempt to stave off your next reply, yes I probably should > have discussed this with the rest of portmgr first. However the > phase one build was almost complete so I made a quick judgement > call with my portmgr, re, and package building hats on. If you'd > like to discuss it further, please let's take this discussion to > portmgr@ where it belongs. No discussion necessary, I was only opposed to the idea because I didn't know it could be done cleanly... -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020123234522.U18609>