From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 8 20:58:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856F616A4CE; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 20:58:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FEB43D41; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 20:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i98Kw8o5003070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 9 Oct 2004 00:58:09 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i98Kw8AW003069; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 00:58:08 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@freebsd.org using -f Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 00:58:08 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20041008205808.GB2947@cell.sick.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff , Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <20041008151515.GA3136@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20041008203434.GA2770@cell.sick.ru> <20041008205117.GA7818@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041008205117.GA7818@gothmog.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Calling m_pullup in ether_input X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 20:58:11 -0000 On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:51:17PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: G> Not really. Just trying to see if there _was_ any packet loss first. G> After running for several hours, the counters are still zero. I think G> this means the case of dropped packets would be so rare that there's no G> real reason to worry too much about lost packets. G> I'll keep this change in my workstation for a week or so. No signs of G> dropped packets yet, though. It'll be interesting to run this patch on different Ethernet hardware. On the other thought, if we have a driver that loses packets we probably should already have a PR filed :) -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE