Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 22:21:28 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [review request] zfsboot/zfsloader: support accessing filesystems within a pool Message-ID: <20120501202128.GD18650@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <4F9E3971.7090405@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F8999D2.1080902@FreeBSD.org> <20120422212102.GA66855@alchemy.franken.de> <4F9A6180.8090500@FreeBSD.org> <20120429164623.GG68446@alchemy.franken.de> <4F9E3971.7090405@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:04:17AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 29/04/2012 19:46 Marius Strobl said the following: > > Given that you certainly have a well better knowledge of ZFS, it > > would be great if we could do it the other way around, i.e. commit > > the sparc64 support first and then your patch after adapting > > whatever you have in mind with things becoming different. In other > > words, I'm basically ready to commit the following patch. As for > > zfs_dev_init() this just wraps it in #if defined(__amd64__) || > > defined(__i386__) in zfs.c for now. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/boot_zfs_sparc64.diff > > OK, let's do it this way. > Thanks! Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120501202128.GD18650>