From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 12 07:07:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA06524 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 12 May 1998 07:07:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA06517 for ; Tue, 12 May 1998 07:07:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com) Received: from localhost (benedict@localhost) by echonyc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA17604; Tue, 12 May 1998 10:06:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 10:06:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre Reply-To: ben@rosengart.com To: Karl Denninger cc: Kirk McKusick , Ollivier Robert , julian@whistle.com, Luoqi Chen , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why Soft Updates are not a mount option In-Reply-To: <19980511195711.30170@mcs.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 11 May 1998, Karl Denninger wrote: > Ah, ok. Seems a good bit better than 'ok' to me. ;-) > Now if it were only stable enough to attempt to use in some of the places > that it would REALLY help things (like our INN news machine). That's a problem with the port to FreeBSD, not Kirk's code, no? Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message