Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 May 2009 10:47:56 -0400
From:      Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "question@freebsd.org" <question@freebsd.org>, "hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: In search of a video card
Message-ID:  <6FBF1838-3CB3-41EC-9178-0993EAE3AB84@mired.org>
In-Reply-To: <d763ac660905132242yff175a6idd1d322aa95d30a7@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20090514030634.GA1252@mooseriver.com> <20090514000203.3d053800@bhuda.mired.org> <20090514041834.GB1418@mooseriver.com> <d763ac660905132242yff175a6idd1d322aa95d30a7@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 14, 2009, at 1:42, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> 2009/5/14 Josef Grosch <jgrosch@mooseriver.com>:
>
>> I don't need 2d & 3d acceleration. I just need a card that will  
>> handle
>> WindowMaker on a 24 inch Dell monitor at 1920x1200 and as long as  
>> the flesh
>> tones on my JPGs don't suck I'm happy.
>>
>> Thanks for the advice. I guess I'm going to make a trip to Fry's  
>> Friday.
>
> I've experienced no-acceleration radeon driver "desktop" under Ubuntu
> and FreeBSD; let me please point out how sluggish and horribly slow it
> Is.

Well, the stock Ubuntu desktop is Gnome, which I find sluggish and  
horribly slow on amd64 hardware even with Nvidias 2d & 3d acceleration  
at any size above 1024x768 - at least in it's default config.

If all depends on your window manager, config and expectations.

       <mike



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6FBF1838-3CB3-41EC-9178-0993EAE3AB84>