From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 11 21:38:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC3A1065672; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A568FC0C; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvg11 with SMTP id 11so4204249pvg.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:38:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6RcsUVCy9rUjpK8kfpOXi6pH8A4mZF85yKApD3bR6l4=; b=eTi2eXGWAAVpS6h60SO1VgCHXdGN2eJ309w+UZbbCghpULn6heWZBkkwkkA7G+pXjZ h9DMXTTjGvJqrBbbs/cFI2B2UVUT7vx8APRkNwmsfurUAfSLGrNCoXfboP1XkKpEh3Hp U4iAVlMCWYBoLXuhJHf0MQjlVzFzSuAmxk27Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.32.165 with SMTP id k5mr7923900pbi.273.1310420301441; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.49.42 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:38:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110711204049.GA98996@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20110706162811.GA68436@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20110706193636.GA69550@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4E14CCE5.4050906@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110707015151.GB71966@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20110711204049.GA98996@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:38:21 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Steve Kargl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Current , "Hartmann, O." , arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:38:22 -0000 Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> >> For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_ >> patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system is >> particularly interesting. But it is not likely to happen in FreeBSD >> where FreeBSD committers are clearly more free than other at >> checking-in un-publicly-reviewed stuff (especially _bad_ stuff). >> >> This would of course apply even to long-time committers, no matter how >> it hurt their ego (which I definitively do not care about). >> > > As a long time GCC committer, I think that you have grossly > over-simplified the GCC review process and how a submitted > patch is approved for committing. > Yes. - Arnaud