From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 17:14:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E27F16A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:14:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from neptune.atopia.net (neptune.atopia.net [209.128.231.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3767A43D48 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:14:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (pcp173257pcs.plsntv01.nj.comcast.net [68.46.70.16]) by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF62409C; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:14:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42B99C8C.5030608@atopia.net> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:14:52 -0400 From: Matt Juszczak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041129) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fenix@ramb.com.ua References: <42B98AD0.7080508@atopia.net> <945588776.20050622191046@ramb.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <945588776.20050622191046@ramb.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Machines dieing, we've tried so much.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:14:53 -0000 >I had same situation with to different high loaded servers (both SMP, with 8Gb of >ram, and HT enabled,), with 5.4 Release, after disabeling HT and cvsup >OS to 5.4-stable all working fine without any problems, last reboot was 28 >days ago. > > > > That's exactly our config. SMP, 4 gb RAM, HT was enabled, no longer. Should I upgrade to 5.4-STABLE? Is there a bug ? Is 5.4-STABLE "stable" enough? :) Also, if I cvsup to 5.4-STABLE right now, would I be able to upgrade to 5.5-RELEASE with no probs, or would I forever be at -STABLE? Thanks, Matt