From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 22:09:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B395D16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B1E43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:09:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1325A2FD6; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:09:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 906FB6526; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:09:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:09:48 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: Lars Eggert Message-ID: <20051108220948.GA2602@stack.nl> References: <20051108204603.GA2121@stack.nl> <280E31B0-BA54-404A-8CD4-2EF64F767B9A@netlab.nec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <280E31B0-BA54-404A-8CD4-2EF64F767B9A@netlab.nec.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 6.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Marc Olzheim , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP RST handling in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:09:50 -0000 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:56:41PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote: > On Nov 8, 2005, at 12:46, Marc Olzheim wrote: > >Being on the wrong end of a distributed tcp syn flood attack atm. =20 > >on the > >machine I'm mailing from, is probably enough to convince me of its =20 > >use. >=20 > The change we are discussing is not protecting you from SYN floods, =20 > it is supposed to protect you from spoofed RSTs. Whoops, indeed, I misread. Well then, still glad to inform you that I'm happy with the performance of the machine under a synflood attack :-P Marc --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcSIsezjnobFOgrERAuyaAJ99FFZ5VGYl0RIDr502qXYbH3nUjgCgi2IV ph1xL/8GVJPs33RCnrO77wc= =DuhM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--