From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 25 20:10:01 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337EB960
 for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.135])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014B78FC0A
 for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9PKA0DY098887
 for <freebsd-rc@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:10:00 GMT
 (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9PKA02d098886;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:10:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:10:00 GMT
Message-Id: <201210252010.q9PKA02d098886@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: conf/122968
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
 <freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:10:01 -0000

The following reply was made to PR conf/122968; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: conf/122968
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:04:20 +0100

 This is a problem indeed, and can easily be fixed with this hint from
 the submitter.
 
 While in this file, we can use REQUIRE in netif rather than BEFORE in addswap.
 
 Would anyone care to approve?
 
 http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/122968.diff
 
 Chris