Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:43:22 -0700 From: Arun Sharma <adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org> To: tlambert@primenet.com Cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP meeting summary Message-ID: <200006290443.VAA14300@sharmas.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <200006282337.QAA07749@usr08.primenet.com> References: <200006282337.QAA07749@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:37:41 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> wrote: > > That would be on allocating, deleting, and enumerating lists of > structures. Sure, when the groups of data structures are manipulated together, it makes sense to just use a single lock. But do you have any statistics to say that this is the common case ? The granularity of the lock certainly needs to match up with the common use case. -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006290443.VAA14300>