From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 28 16:37:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D28106566B for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F378FC1C for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFB1C46B45; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:37:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 754E98A01F; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:37:03 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:58:40 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-CBSD-20091103; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <20091222174248.GA61700@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <86ws072she.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86ws072she.fsf@ds4.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200912281058.40733.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:37:03 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= , Anton Shterenlikht , "b. f." Subject: Re: still trouble with pci.c on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:37:04 -0000 On Monday 28 December 2009 7:27:57 am Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > This discussion is pointless if your source tree is not a Subversion > working copy. That's not true. I still use cvsweb quite often as one can more easily see= =20 what has been MFC'd that way rather than with the svn equivalent. And it i= s=20 easy to use cvsweb to find a particular CVS revision and map it to an SVN=20 revision. =2D-=20 John Baldwin