From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Sep  4  0:28:33 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D16CA37B423; Mon,  4 Sep 2000 00:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sheldonh@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA75359;
	Mon, 4 Sep 2000 00:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 00:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: <sheldonh@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200009040728.AAA75359@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: khera@kciLink.com, sheldonh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/20974: securelevel not reset when going to single user mode
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: securelevel not reset when going to single user mode

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open
State-Changed-By: sheldonh
State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 4 00:27:16 PDT 2000
State-Changed-Why: 
Okay, I see where I'm going wrong.  I'm arguing that the manual
page is not inaccurate.  The originator is arguing that 
FreeBSD doesn't handle securelevel on return to single-user
mode the same way that BSD/OS does and maintains that the
BSD/OS behaviour is more useful.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20974


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message