From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 10:02:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8318A16A4CE; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:02:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDF043F93; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:02:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FE2548A3; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:02:02 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 441036D455; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:02:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:02:02 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Mark Murray Message-ID: <20031201180202.GD244@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Mark Murray , Дейтер Александр Валериевич , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <02be01c3b5a6$a78a8ea0$b901320a@komi.mts.ru> <200312010859.hB18x2Dw094198@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312010859.hB18x2Dw094198@grimreaper.grondar.org> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org cc: Дейтер Александр Валериевич Subject: Re: Kerberized applications in FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:02:46 -0000 On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:59:02AM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > =?koi8-r?B?5MXK1MXSIOHMxcvTwc7E0iD3wczF0snF18ne?= writes: > > In FreeBSD 5.x only telnet/telnetd works 'out of box' with kerberos. > > Why ftp/ftpd, ssh/sshd and cvs do not support kerberos ? > > You need to turn it obn by hand in /etc/pam.d/*. Its not on by default, > because that would cause nasty delays in PAM. I think he meant *actual* Kerberos support i.e. at the protocol level, not just password-authentication-via-Kerberos. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine NTT/Verio SME FreeBSD UNIX Heimdal nectar@celabo.org jvidrine@verio.net nectar@freebsd.org nectar@kth.se