From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 23 13: 5:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wrs.com (unknown-1-11.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3940437B404 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:05:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from windriver.com ([128.224.195.173]) by mail.wrs.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA03274; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:03:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3C4F2565.BB0F4C15@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:04:37 -0500 From: Tadayuki OKADA Organization: Wind River X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79C-ja [ja_JP.EUC] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: ja, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger , tadayuki@mediaone.net, mi@aldan.algebra.com, will@csociety.org, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/gd Makefile pkg-comment References: <200201231608.g0NG8qa05110@Magelan.Leidinger.net> <3C4EEEA8.AAB0300A@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Tadayuki OKADA wrote: > > Yes. That's true. But this isn't common practice. The actual common > > practice is to not increment the PORTREVISION if a library increments > > its version number (and you've got an explanation why). > Who said the actual common practice is not to bump PORTREVISION? BTW, Porter's Handbook says you need to bump PORTREVISON: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/x387.html -- Tadayuki OKADA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message