Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:01:38 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Harlan Stenn <harlan@everett.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -P and local changes Message-ID: <20041226150137.GB2566@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041226090451.2A69A54878@minnie.everett.org> References: <20041226090451.2A69A54878@minnie.everett.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:04:51AM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Is there a way to tell portupgrade that it should not *fetch* prebuilt ports
> for these two packages? If the packages are already there I'm fine having
> them installed (as it means they were built using the Makefile.local values
> and wrapped as a package from the -p flag).
Doesn't it use packages if they're present in the ${PACKAGES}
directory (/usr/ports/packages by default)?
Kris
--kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBztJRWry0BWjoQKURAlBKAJ0RE2n9rxe5M5GIl0uTMpzFsuApQQCcC7OJ
d5kP9f5uubT9nNJx4T8sq4A=
=hmTy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041226150137.GB2566>