From owner-freebsd-afs Sun Dec 7 13:26:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA24033 for afs-outgoing; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 13:26:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.its.rpi.edu (dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu [128.113.161.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA24025 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 13:25:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Received: from localhost (dec@localhost) by phoenix.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA26524 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 16:25:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 16:25:34 -0500 (EST) From: "David E. Cross" To: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: stable or current? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I was wondering if we should develop on -stable or -current? I am a -stable machine myself, and would *greatly* perfer to do the work on -stable. But i realize the future is -current... I am hoping that if we stick with -stable, that re-porting to -current wouldn't be too difficult... any comments on this? -- David Cross ACS Consutltant