Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:25:41 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 260523] ar: with -T option disabled
Message-ID:  <bug-260523-7788-CmxBWeHmKJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-260523-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-260523-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260523

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[exp-run] ar with -T option |ar: with -T option disabled
                   |disabled                    |
              Flags|                            |maintainer-feedback?(emaste
                   |                            |@freebsd.org)
           See Also|                            |https://github.com/llvm/llv
                   |                            |m-project/issues/25899
                 CC|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org      |emaste@freebsd.org,
                   |                            |portmgr@FreeBSD.org
            Product|Ports & Packages            |Base System
                URL|                            |https://reviews.freebsd.org
                   |                            |/D33553
             Status|New                         |In Progress
          Component|Ports Framework             |bin
           Assignee|portmgr@FreeBSD.org         |emaste@freebsd.org
            Version|Latest                      |CURRENT
         Depends on|                            |260810

--- Comment #11 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
^Triage: No longer an exp-run (please just just the flag). Assign to commit=
ter
resolving, re-classify (base issue, affecting ports, with base change)

Given comment 10:

"The warning will be changed to an error in the future (in main), once port=
s no
longer use -T." ..  leave issues blocking this (in progress) issue, at least
for tracking purposes.

@Ed Is there any value/desire here to change our ar over time / long-term t=
o be
consistent with other ar's, or is that effective a noop given the switch to
llvm-ar? Said another way, is the target state that 'our ar' is deprecated =
and
removed?


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260810
[Bug 260810] www/node*: incorrect ar invocation
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-260523-7788-CmxBWeHmKJ>