From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 18 9: 1: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hyperion.eclipse.net.uk (hyperion.eclipse.net.uk [195.188.32.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A7015106 for ; Tue, 18 May 1999 09:00:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stuart@eclipse.net.uk) Received: from eclipse.net.uk (elara.eclipse.net.uk [195.188.32.31]) by hyperion.eclipse.net.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA87919 for ; Tue, 18 May 1999 17:00:31 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <37418F3E.F36486E5@eclipse.net.uk> Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 17:03:10 +0100 From: Stuart Henderson Organization: Eclipse Networking Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache log files References: <199905181545.LAA02511@kiwi.datasys.net> <19990518175649.A9258@xenetserver.harz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Matthias Meyser wrote: > > > I wonder how much of a perormance impact forking logger would > > have vs. using syslog(), especially on high traffic servers. > > > As I understand the the "piped to" programm is only forked at startup > and then all further logentries are piped to it. Unless the child doesn't read it's pipe often enough in which case Apache will restart it (without restarting the server). This is detailed in Apache 1.3 release notes. Cheers Stuart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message