Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:59:14 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        George Barnett <george@alink.co.za>
Cc:        Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: uucp
Message-ID:  <20030312185914.GA86851@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <03de01c2e8ad$5b36cee0$c74608c3@spoem>
References:  <031701c2e88e$cf9fed80$c74608c3@spoem> <b4nir2$2j6l$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <03de01c2e8ad$5b36cee0$c74608c3@spoem>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:37:57PM -0000, George Barnett wrote:
> From: "Christian Weisgerber" <naddy@mips.inka.de>
>=20
> > > Now, I can either go and add the user UUCP..
> >
> > Do so.  Why did you remove it in the first place?
>=20
> I have no use for anything to do with uucp.  Why should the user remain on
> the system if they're not going to be doing anything?

Because the uucp user is still used to own devices and files related
to serial port locking:

> > This says "do not build uucp related programs".  It does not say
> > to ignore every traditional usage of the user "uucp" for serial
> > locking etc.

Kris

--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+b4OBWry0BWjoQKURAikcAJ9NYQEt3EkabgpYDerIK3Uztb4MTACgxOrV
7XpsqFiqbWmhPcKSr8IDkZ4=
=5+DV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030312185914.GA86851>