From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Nov 3 13:29:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA05479 for mobile-outgoing; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 13:29:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile) Received: from gvr.gvr.org (root@gvr.gvr.org [194.151.74.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05473 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 13:29:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from guido@gvr.org) Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.gvr.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id WAA10801; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 22:26:33 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199711032126.WAA10801@gvr.gvr.org> Subject: Re: problems after PAO -> 2.2.5 stable In-Reply-To: <199711030534.QAA01689@word.smith.net.au> from Mike Smith at "Nov 3, 97 04:04:55 pm" To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 22:26:33 +0100 (MET) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Well, it sounds like my logic above is screwed. Let's be Sherlock: > > - pccardd doesn't do it (I checked) > - the kernel doesn't do it (I checked) > - the card _can't_ do it (it has no idea what IRQ is actually being > generated) > > So once the impossible has been eliminated, I can only conclude that > the pcic *does* interpret the CIS. > Mine does not. I now configured it to use irq 11 (thoygh the cis tuples only mention 3 and 4). -Guido