From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 30 17:05:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A01106567B for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from en0f@bokey.mine.nu) Received: from mine.nu (60-242-68-238.static.tpgi.com.au [60.242.68.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7470C8FC20 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from en0f@bokey.mine.nu) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (windows [192.168.1.110]) by mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBEE9EB92B for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:34:55 +1030 (CST) Message-ID: <4909E93F.1070704@bokey.mine.nu> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:35:03 +1030 From: en0f User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20081030154512.GB80375@phat.za.net> <7b873e39ac6eb91f7d2d3a1088207498@localhost> In-Reply-To: <7b873e39ac6eb91f7d2d3a1088207498@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Script-friendly (parseble) ps(1) output? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: en0f@bokey.mine.nu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:05:06 -0000 Marian Hettwer wrote: [ .. ] > I wouldn't do that. IIRC procfs(5) is deprecated in FreeBSD. > But I could be wrong... Just wanted to point out since discussion of procfs came up - I think this was FreeBSD6.2 IIRC, I had to mount /proc manually for a Java application to work because the code was implemented in Linux using JDK1.5 and a day came when our app had to run on FreeBSD =:-P). I still remember we had a heck of time trying to find a solution! This could probably help some poor little bugger searching for solution in the future. -- en0f