From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Mar 9 22:35:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from molly.straylight.com (molly.straylight.com [209.68.199.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73D537B72C for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 22:35:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonathan@graehl.org) Received: from dickie (case.straylight.com [209.68.199.244]) by molly.straylight.com (8.11.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id f2A6ZNw06951 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 22:35:23 -0800 From: "Jonathan Graehl" To: "freebsd-Arch" Subject: RE: missing #includes in /usr/include headers (was RE: Generating SYN packets.) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 22:35:38 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010309184342.A13688@mollari.cthul.hu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Correct, -arch is for discussion of new architectural features. ... and, apparently, in which directory which files will reside ;) Seriously, what is the appropriate forum for a request for header file reorganization? > > they include some of their prerequisites, they seem to assume that you have > > already included several other headers. > > This is considered to be the correct behaviour. > > Kris Where is this behavior documented? For instance, sysctl says several sysctl codes are defined in certain header files, but nowhere in that man page or in the header files is any such policy documented. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message