From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 1 08:22:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA03037 for current-outgoing; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 08:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA03030 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 08:22:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by ki.net (8.7.4/8.7.4) with SMTP id LAA03137 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 11:22:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 11:22:00 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Advice/Recommendation needed Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi... I've been running -stable on my main machine for the past little while, but due to what I believe to be a hard drive problem, I'm replacing the root drive. What I'm wondering is, what is the reliability level of -SNAP currently? Should I stick with -stable on that machine? Or is -SNAP more stable then -stable? Main thing to consider is that I have a partner that is against FreeBSD (cause its free) and would like to get our main server as rock-solid as possible so that she can't use instability as an argument against me :( Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting System | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge, Administrator | | Information and scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://www.ki.net | Communications, Inc