From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 09:06:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681F237B401 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 09:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDCE43FAF for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38ldva3.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.253.67] helo=mindspring.com) by puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19IsaU-0001YF-00; Thu, 22 May 2003 09:06:39 -0700 Message-ID: <3ECCF549.25F4B4C3@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:05:29 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <200305201025.30296.jlido@goof.com> <200305201216.10964.jlido@goof.com> <20030520180004.GA2372@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030522011014.GC27806@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4920d6112372ec1aef09e70fc770fa548350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Jon Lido cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc/libm floating-point bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 16:06:42 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2003 18:10:14 -0700, David O'Brien > wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 03:12:27PM -0400, Jon Lido wrote: > >> Yes, this was the problem. I rebuilt world with -march=pentium3 and > >> that did the trick. > > > > Honest question of you -- I'll assume you're subscribed to > > freebsd-current@. How have you missed all the warnings from myself and > > others not to trust the -march=pentium4 optimizations? I honestly want > > to know so we can figure out a better way of getting the word out. > > Perhaps, it should be add in the errata? Also, add the comments in the > make.conf. Perhaps the GCC folks could fix their compiler. -- Terry