From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 14:00:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465E916A46C; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.bawue.com) Received: from voodoo.bawue.com (voodoo.bawue.com [212.9.161.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E6513C48C; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.bawue.com) Received: from krion by voodoo.bawue.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HzCLA-000GTb-49; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:59:52 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:59:52 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20070615135952.GE19707@voodoo.bawue.com> References: <200706151319.l5FDJ3ZT002340@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/ppracer Makefile pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:00:11 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:25:56PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 6/15/07, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > danfe 2007-06-15 13:19:03 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > games/ppracer Makefile pkg-descr > > Log: > > - Fix the build with latest GCC [1] > > - Improve on COMMENT and port description > > - Utilize USE_DOS2UNIX > > - Clean up Makefile > > > > Reported by: pointyhat [1] > > Please give credit to the actual human being, e.g > "pointyhat via kris" or "pointyhat via pav". If you > examined the logs yourself than "portsmon" should > be appropriate. Andrew, please stop sending such kind of comments to ports-committers@ alias, in this case it really should be sent privately. But, frankly speaking, even if I get it privately, I'd smile. You should really *think* before you mail your comments to ports-committers list, these above comments are unappropriate here. Please move all you technical items for commits whether to ports@ and discuss it there, or privately, depending how *important* is your comment. Inserting the coins for every commit and do it in ports-committers@ is not what I expected while discussing technical review explanations. -Kirill