From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 27 14:37:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5930E1065670 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EA78FC12 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from [195.4.92.18] (helo=8.mx.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1MKZ25-0005HC-Lu; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:37:33 +0200 Received: from teb7a.t.pppool.de ([89.55.235.122]:48651 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 8.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #79) id 1MKZ25-00075u-48; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:37:33 +0200 Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:37:32 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Kamigishi Rei Message-ID: <20090627163732.0dc47d93@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4A462A7A.20005@haruhiism.net> References: <4A4517BE.9040504@FreeBSD.org> <20090627141412.GN31709@acme.spoerlein.net> <4A462A7A.20005@haruhiism.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:37:35 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:19:38 +0400 Kamigishi Rei wrote: > This poses the question of daXX enumeration order. I've already had some > 'fun' with an IBM server which has an LVD/320 SCSI controller. While the > controller's bus was enumerated properly, somehow if you attach an USB > mass storage device before the system boot that said mass storage could > suddenly appear earlier than one of the SCSI disks (that was on > 7.0-RELEASE) thus breaking the boot process sometimes (when it appeared > as da0). > This is why I always wire down my SCSI devices in devices.hint. --- Gary Jennejohn