Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:56:57 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: improving find -<a|c|m>min option description Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmm_LsXXHZHSGjmHXRy%2BNUuEkTtduV3XwS2hmxspeGpNA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=obJ2dG7HKBVuNfcd0AUspQA_uvj1Y23sB4_aoP5nHyQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201210230851.q9N8pYXg052407@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <CAF6rxg=obJ2dG7HKBVuNfcd0AUspQA_uvj1Y23sB4_aoP5nHyQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 October 2012 11:43, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: > On 23 October 2012 04:51, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: >> find(1) man page has: > ... >> Does anybody agree/disagree with me? > > I completely agree with you. Take a look to see how -perm handles the > + and - options. > >> I'll provide a patch if there is agreement. > > Please mail it to me. I will do my best to get it into the tree. I'm still waiting for approval, but I'll let you know when I commit. :) -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmm_LsXXHZHSGjmHXRy%2BNUuEkTtduV3XwS2hmxspeGpNA>