From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  5 16:55:06 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A44816A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Mar 2005 16:55:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from elvenbow.nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp (elvenbow.nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
	[133.5.6.4])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304BA43D31
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Mar 2005 16:55:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp)
Received: from localhost (kasahara@elvenbow.nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp [IPv6:::1])
	j25Gt2Iw048534
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 01:55:02 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp)
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:55:02 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20050306.015502.73731903.kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: Yoshiaki Kasahara <kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <22209.1110018710@bizet.nethelp.no>
References: <20050305095601.GA4821@freebie.xs4all.nl>
	<22209.1110018710@bizet.nethelp.no>
X-Fingerprint: CDA2 B6B6 6796 0DD3 9D80  2602 E909 4623 A15E A074
X-URL: http://www.nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp/~kasahara/
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 22.0.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: 1000baseTX?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:55:06 -0000

Hi,

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 11:31:50 +0100,
	sthaug@nethelp.no said:

> So I stand by my claim that 1000base-T is clearly more correct than
> 1000baseTX. It would be nice to get this fixed - however, it is a
> minor point and I certainly believe that there are other tasks that
> are more important.

Thank you for your additional information about documentation.  And I
agree with your comment that it is a minor problem.  I see frequent
(sometimes very minor) rewrites/fixing typos of comments and documents
in FreeBSD source tree, so I thought it was worth mentioning...

Regards,
-- 
Yoshiaki Kasahara
Computing and Communications Center, Kyushu University
kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp