From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 15:05:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48BD16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F2543D2F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:05:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i2BN4u0Q087785; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:04:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)i2BN4t8H087782; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:04:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:04:55 -0500 (EST) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Julian Stecklina In-Reply-To: <86llm7hx46.fsf@web.de> Message-ID: <20040311180241.R21071@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867FD@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> <86llm7hx46.fsf@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I like SCHED_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:05:03 -0000 On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Julian Stecklina wrote: > "Will Saxon" writes: > > > I am not experiencing this with firefox. It takes 2-3 seconds to load. > > I am also not experiencing issues with screen redraws. > > How did you get firefox to load that fast? It takes about 15 seconds > on my 1GHz laptop. Laptop hard disk drives and memory are significantly slower than their desktop counterparts. Add cpu power-saving to the mix and you're right in line with the numbers. Compare apples with oranges, and you're bound to feel a little cheated... ;) Regards, > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >