From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 12:03:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E77516A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:03:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D416643D46 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:03:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marchenko@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so41634rnk for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.67.72 with SMTP id p72mr607353rna; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.22.66 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:03:19 -0400 From: Vlad To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <415940B0.6050008@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4158BFAC.7050601@ispro.net.tr> <200409271628.02524.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <4159431F.6010502@ispro.net.tr> <4159C77F.7080600@ispro.net.tr> <415940B0.6050008@elischer.org> cc: rwatson@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Evren Yurtesen Subject: Re: panic: sorele X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vlad List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:03:29 -0000 Ok, as far as I can see FreeBSD kernel represent it like another CPU so the situation should be similar to a true SMP box. You might want to disable HTT in your kernel and that should fix 'panic: solere' problem same way as it does fix panic for me when run on a sinlge CPU in true SMP server. Give it a try :) On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:45:04 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> > >> it looks like you do have at least two CPUs... cpu#1 is a second CPU, > >> or I'm mistaken? > >> > > > > Like I said, it is this hyperthreading from intel. Look from google for > > hyperthreading. It is suppose to improve performance but who knows... > > > > -e- > > _______________________________________________ -- Vlad