From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 02:28:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C0E16A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:28:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ox.eicat.ca (ox.eicat.ca [66.96.30.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FA543D3F for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:28:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by ox.eicat.ca (Postfix, from userid 66) id 0A78DC7F8; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:28:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id EE3FC1D2344; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:28:44 -0400 (EDT) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16768.22876.926445.412412@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:28:44 -0400 To: "George V. Neville-Neil" In-Reply-To: References: <16767.52282.937187.190919@canoe.dclg.ca> <6.1.2.0.0.20041027124606.09c40768@64.7.153.2> <16767.53956.366966.737912@canoe.dclg.ca> <6.1.2.0.0.20041027131824.10140c90@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta17) "chayote" (+CVS-20040321) XEmacs Lucid cc: David Gilbert cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: IPSec on current. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:28:59 -0000 >>>>> "George" == George V Neville-Neil writes: George> At Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:19:33 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> At 12:54 PM 27/10/2004, David Gilbert wrote: >> >> >So ... are you saying that FAST_IPSEC excludes INET6? >> >> As far as I know, yes. It needs to be disabled. In the BUGS section >> of the man page, "There is presently no support for IPv6." >> >> Perhaps sam@freebsd.org can confirm. George> Just for the record, yes, FAST_IPSEC does not support INET6. It's also possible that the division panic and the GPF panic were with and without INET6. I not on the machine at the momment. Not supporting IPv6 is less of a showstopper than not supporting FAST_IPSEC as the later is required (for isntance) BGP. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================