Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:16:45 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 279908] devel/cmake: autogen (moc/uic) processes don't respect MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER
Message-ID:  <bug-279908-7788-4JRfS9FKNg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-279908-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-279908-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279908

Jason E. Hale <jhale@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|Open                        |Closed

--- Comment #6 from Jason E. Hale <jhale@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Anton Saietskii from comment #4)

> I can confirm that with the patch, no excess moc processes being spawned.

Thanks for confirming! Committed.

> BTW, either CMake documentation is incorrect or it's the bug.
> I have 1 CPU, 4 physical cores, HT -- and previously, 8 moc processed wer=
e spawned,
> which doesn't align with "number of threads/processes to the number of ph=
ysical CPUs"
> in any way.
> However, I don't work with CMake extensively, so not willing to report th=
is upstream.

It's probably more of a documentation bug by means of generalization. CMake=
, at
least for FreeBSD, uses what is reported by `sysctl -n hw.ncpu` to determine
the number of CPUs for this purpose. On my laptop, I also have 1 CPU with 4
physical cores with HT and the output of that command is "8", so it would m=
ake
sense that up to and including 8 processes would be spawned before this cha=
nge.

> P.S. I wish someone from gecko@ could review PRs so quick...

I don't like commenting on FreeBSD ports teams that I'm not involved with, =
but
some are way more understaffed than others and sometimes sadly only consist=
 of
one person, so it may take more time for them to address PRs. We at kde@ are
currently a relatively robust team and do our best to stay on top of things.
Even still, we do miss things such as this and appreciate your report.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-279908-7788-4JRfS9FKNg>