Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Nov 1997 13:31:19 -0800
From:      David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To:        Eric Anderson <keric@websidestory.com>
Cc:        Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Ethernet problem with 2.2.5 and 3C509B 
Message-ID:  <199711142131.NAA09421@implode.root.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Nov 1997 12:03:40 PST." <Pine.BSI.3.96.971114104637.18807D-100000@mail.websidestory.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Maybe someone else can help me explain this - we're running a whole
>bunch of Intel 10/100 nics on Pentium Pro/II machines here and every
>machine to the T has this type of problem:
>
>bash-2.01$ netstat -i 
>Name  Mtu   Network       Address            Ipkts Ierrs    Opkts Oerrs Coll
>fxp0  1500  <Link>      00.a0.c9.6e.e5.xx 10023234     0  8567462     0 4867357
>fxp0  1500  hitbox-netblk xxx             10023234     0  8567462     0 4867357
>lo0   16384 <Link>                              50     0       50     0 0
>lo0   16384 127           localhost             50     0       50     0 0
>bash-2.01$
>
>Of course, these machines are experiencing huge data loads (2+ million
>hits/day) BUT.. we also have a couple of machines with the 3Com 905 NICs
>getting the same traffic load and:
>
>bash-2.01$ netstat -i
>Name  Mtu   Network       Address            Ipkts Ierrs    Opkts Oerrs Coll
>vx0   1500  <Link>      00.60.97.b5.a3.xx  5855565     0  5020088     0 30
>vx0   1500  hitbox-netblk xxx              5855565     0  5020088     0 30
>lo0   16384 <Link>                              28     0       28     0 0
>lo0   16384 127           localhost             28     0       28     0 0
>bash-2.01$
>
>and those figures are consistent with the other 3Com cards we have.  Is
>the 3Com driver just better?  None of the cards are in full duplex mode,
>though I tried with the Intel cards (man fxp) and none of the
>link1-link2 options work - they just shut the card down.

   I'm not sure I understand what the problem is. Please explain the nature
of the problem you are having - other than the collision rate being a bit
high, I don't see anything wrong with the above numbers. You mentioned that
you tried setting full duplex...what is the machine connected to? It must
be connected to a switch for full duplex to work. Moreover, if the switch
is a Cisco Catalyst (or Cisco router), you have to configure the switch port
explicitly to full duplex - it will not autonegotiate.
   Also, you mentioned that you are messing with the -link ifconfig flags.
This tells me that you aren't running 2.2.5, -stable, or -current, since
in all of those cases, the method for setting the duplex and speed is entirely
different.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711142131.NAA09421>