From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jul 19 20:38:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [207.240.140.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C958F14C83 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 20:38:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freyes@inch.com) Received: from your-name (freyes.static.inch.com [207.240.212.43]) by arutam.inch.com (8.9.1a/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA13375; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 23:36:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199907200336.XAA13375@arutam.inch.com> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "David Kelly" , "Nik Clayton" Cc: "FreeBSd Chat list" Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 23:37:12 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 98 (4.10.1998) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: When should vendors be removed from Gallery? Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 20:11:29 -0500, David Kelly wrote: >>On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 01:10:38AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: >>> The vendor .... >>> ... added "Linux solutions" to their name and removed the >>> "Powered by FreeBSD logo" off their site even >>> Is this enough reason to remove them off the Gallery of vendors? >> Would've thought so. Who was this? >Sounds like Atipa, http://www.atipa.com/. I've since found better >alternatives. Yes it is Atipa. They are not bad people, but it is a matter of the FreeBSD gallery should be for companies that offer a service to the FreeBSD community. Atipa no longer seems to be interested in that. I also don't understand how all of a sudden they seem to be ashamed of FreeBSD and won't even list it on the OSs they will install. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message