From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 3 04:20:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA04378 for current-outgoing; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 04:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache.relcom.ru [194.58.229.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA04371 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 04:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.8.6/8.8.5) id PAA00610; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 15:19:51 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 15:19:50 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= To: Julian Elischer cc: FreeBSD-current , Brian Somers , Chuck Robey , Joerg Wunsch Subject: Re: ppp & HUP. In-Reply-To: <33BB1473.33590565@whistle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Julian Elischer wrote: > I have processes that close down assuming they have > 5 or 6 seconds to do so when they receive HUP. > it's traditional. I don't like changing such traditions.. It seems you mix SIGHUP and SIGTERM, the exact Tradition was: SIGTERM, 10 secs, SIGKILL There is no SIGHUP in Tradition. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/