From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Jun 28 10:12:09 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EFD1029250 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356F374AC8 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E00C6102924D; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD99102924C for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592DB74AC5 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C92E164DC for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5SAC7vJ053057 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5SAC7D7053056 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229385] graphics/mesa-libs requires devel/llvm60 from ports, should use base on 11.2-RELEASE? Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marko.cupac@mimar.rs X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:12:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229385 Bug ID: 229385 Summary: graphics/mesa-libs requires devel/llvm60 from ports, should use base on 11.2-RELEASE? Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: marko.cupac@mimar.rs CC: brooks@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org CC: brooks@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Hi, now that 11.2-RELEASE has clang/LLVM 6.0 in base: pacija@majsta:~ % sudo freebsd-version -ku 11.2-RELEASE 11.2-RELEASE pacija@majsta:~ % clang --version FreeBSD clang version 6.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_600/final 326565) (based on LLVM 6.0.0) Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.2 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin I am building in 11.2 poudriere jail: pacija@majsta:~ % sudo poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH 11_2:x86:64 11.2-RELEASE amd64 ftp 2018-06-27 10:47:25 /portbuild/poudriere/jails/11_2_x86_64 is it possible to make graphics/mesa-lib port use base LLVM instead of the = one from the port? Building devel/llvm60 takes ~7 hours in poudriere on my aging build machine, I'd like to avoid it, if possible. Just a user here, pardon me if what I say makes no sense at all :) Here's peculiar line from poudriere log: =3D=3D=3D> Returning to build of mesa-libs-18.1.2 =3D=3D=3D> mesa-libs-18.1.2 depends on package: llvm60>=3D3.9.0_4 Shouldn't it check the existence of supported llvm in base first? Thank you in advance. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=