From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 13:58:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7158A106566B; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:58:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060038FC0A; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (HSI-KBW-091-089-161-008.hsi2.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [91.89.161.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 170367E888; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:43:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F0EE383.2040502@bsdforen.de> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:43:31 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111223 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scheidell@FreeBSD.org References: <201201120904.q0C94N5N035369@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201201120904.q0C94N5N035369@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, kalten@gmx.at Subject: Re: ports/162996: games/ioquake3-devel: update s2064->s2202 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:58:44 -0000 On 12/01/2012 10:04, scheidell@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Submitter: please update your ports tree, address the issues maintainer outlined in this pr and resubmit a patch. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162996 In my opinion all changes since 2194 aren't significant enough to justify an update. There's a cheat exploit addressed in 2214, which has some value to server operators. In my experience this kind of thing might cause some followup patches, though. Unless I overlooked something it might be a good idea to let that settle for a while. About the MASTERDIR issue, using MASTERDIR has certain drawbacks. Mainly using it will grow my Makefiles a little further. It doesn't really matter any more - so I'll properly do the conversion with the next update. Are there any objections to marking this PR obsolete/closed? On a sidenote, I'm considering splitting the ports into client and dedicated server ports - so that the server can be installed from binary packages without all the dependencies pulled in from the client. Any opinions on that? Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?