From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 25 23:31:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38584250; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8241C49; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [72.5.114.17]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3A74F8FC2B; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 03:30:56 +0400 (MSK) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:30:51 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Tim Kientzle Subject: Re: Port: U-Boot for BeagleBone Message-Id: <20130625163051.10fd81481cd46c2654a11005@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <879F5401-AC0D-494F-AE54-CE8B4AAF289F@freebsd.org> References: <3B16A2E5-C92B-4248-BE98-DD5C1194CB05@freebsd.org> <20130518100512.57c47fe6@bender> <534F7C76-12EF-4BF7-9872-0B2F366358E3@bsdimp.com> <879F5401-AC0D-494F-AE54-CE8B4AAF289F@freebsd.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:31:02 -0000 On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:36:57 -0700 Tim Kientzle mentioned: > > On May 25, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > On May 25, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > > >> > >> On May 18, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >>> A long time ago I was able to build u-boot using the cross-* ports... They even have wrapper ports so you can get the write dependencies. > >> > >> Which wrapper ports are you referring to? > >> > >> I don't see anything that looks useful. > > > > I think I used arm-rtems-{binutils,gcc} to do the building.... > > That's what I was afraid of. arm-rtems-gcc is gone (or will be shortly). > Yes, I tried to prevent that to no avail. The reasons mentioned are completely nonsensical. "rtems" in names of those ports means ABI they provide (which is very close to bare metal) and not the actual OS, but the ports are being removed because someone was unable to build RTEMS on PCBSD. Oh well. Anyway, if you need any help with cross-XXX, let me know. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments