From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 4 6:58:33 2001 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 06:58:28 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from virtual.sysadmin-inc.com (lists.sysadmin-inc.com [209.16.228.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2136A37B698 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 06:58:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from wkst ([209.16.228.146]) by virtual.sysadmin-inc.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA04447 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:03:35 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Peter Brezny" To: Subject: RE: (forw) Two NICs In FreeBSD Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:57:42 -0800 Message-ID: <000101c07677$d62af860$46010a0a@sysadmininc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <003b01c07623$182dedd0$25cbca18@jehovah> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I find it useful, and not that big of a deal to shut off in syslog.conf. However, option c seems like a good idea. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Bosko Milekic Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 11:51 PM To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (forw) Two NICs In FreeBSD I would go with (a) unless someone is religiously obsessed with having the message stay. Else go with (b) but see if you can fit it in with some "generic verbosity" sysctl knob, as opposed to creating its own. Later, Bosko. > /kernel: arp: 1.2.3.4 is on dc0 but got reply from 00:00:c5:79:d0:0c on dc1 > > Hi can we axe this message already? I see the possibility of using > two 100mbit cards on a switch with a gig uplink to be reason enough > to either axe it, or make it a sysctl to quiet the warnings. > > I've also had this broken config setup as a temporary thing and > my console getting flooded was also quite irritating. > > Anyone going to raise a rukus if I turn it > a) off > b) sysctl default off > c) sysctl default on > > thanks, > -Alfred > > ----- Forwarded message from Tim Gustafson ----- > > From: Tim Gustafson > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Two NICs In FreeBSD > Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 23:37:06 -0500 > Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010103233521.00a58890@esther.falconsoft.com> > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 > Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Hello > > I just installed two NIC cards into my FreeBSD machine that are on the same > LAN, each with a different IP. However, I keep getting this sort of > message in my syslog: > > /kernel: arp: 1.2.3.4 is on dc0 but got reply from 00:00:c5:79:d0:0c on dc1 > > I realize that the message is because it's getting two ARP replies, but > this is normal (for this network, anyhow). How can I suppress these > messages from appearing in the syslog? Is it OK to have both interfaces > receiving ARP replies? Will this mess anything up? > > Tim > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Tim Gustafson tim@falconsoft.com > www.falconsoft.com (631)475-6662 > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Share your knowledge - it's a way to achieve immortality. > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] > "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message