From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jul  9 06:27:36 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA29328
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 06:27:36 -0700
Received: (from phk@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA29319
          ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 06:27:35 -0700
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk>
Message-Id: <199507091327.GAA29319@freefall.cdrom.com>
Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches?
To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert)
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 06:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: peter@haywire.dialix.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199507091117.NAA17084@blaise.ibp.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Jul 9, 95 01:17:22 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 761       
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > How about making it either "2.2-BUILT-xxxxxx" or "2.X-BUILT-xxxxx" or
> > even "2.X-CURRENT-xxxxxx".
> > 
> 
> We should revert to something like it was before e.g. 2.2-Development.
> Putting the build date is not really informative because it gives
> no insight about the date of the files themselves... 
> 

You can tell that the files are older than a particular date, that
is very useful.

("BUILT-950703" ?  Hey, He hasn't got the "ls -s panic" patch that
got comitted on july 5th !)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?