Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 06:27:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk> To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Cc: peter@haywire.dialix.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? Message-ID: <199507091327.GAA29319@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: <199507091117.NAA17084@blaise.ibp.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Jul 9, 95 01:17:22 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > How about making it either "2.2-BUILT-xxxxxx" or "2.X-BUILT-xxxxx" or
> > even "2.X-CURRENT-xxxxxx".
> >
>
> We should revert to something like it was before e.g. 2.2-Development.
> Putting the build date is not really informative because it gives
> no insight about the date of the files themselves...
>
You can tell that the files are older than a particular date, that
is very useful.
("BUILT-950703" ? Hey, He hasn't got the "ls -s panic" patch that
got comitted on july 5th !)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507091327.GAA29319>