From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 3 16:56:43 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA01258 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 16:56:43 -0700 Received: from feisal.newera.ab.ca (feisal.newera.ab.ca [198.161.82.137]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA01253 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 16:56:35 -0700 Received: by feisal.newera.ab.ca (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA050644357; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 17:52:37 -0600 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 17:52:36 -0600 (MDT) From: Stephen Mathezer To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: iijppp demand dial and dial in at same time Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I asked this question before but didn't really get any explanation. (If there's a better place/person to ask let me know). I am trying to have the same machine dial out on demand and accept incoming ppp connections. Either one of these works individually, but I can't get them to work together. I have a kernel compiled with two tunnel devices and tun0 and tun1 both exist. The problem arises when I have ppp -auto running (no connection is up) and then I try to connect inbound with ppp. Everything works fine except that I can see a route being added to my router through tun0. iijppp however is using tun1 for the inbound connection since tun0 was taken by the ppp -auto process. I assume that this is an iijppp bug or implementation error on my part. I took a brief look at the iijppp source but quickly got lost. Has anybody seen this before? How do I fix it? Who do I ask about this? I have been told that other people have no problems with this but I can't see what I'm doing differently. This is 2.0.5-RELEASE by the way Thanks for any help -Steve