From owner-cvs-all Sat Jul 14 9: 8:31 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from peace.mahoroba.org (peace.calm.imasy.or.jp [202.227.26.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FAB37B403; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 09:08:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from localhost (IDENT:D/4peBB4SBs495N32YFRnaODVYbifeEBQai/rSw0jb9Zzkwx+DGnfEw66vx7P/4e@localhost [::1]) (authenticated as ume with CRAM-MD5) by peace.mahoroba.org (8.11.4/8.11.4/peace) with ESMTP/inet6 id f6EG7qa89564; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 01:07:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 01:07:51 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20010715.010751.41712475.ume@mahoroba.org> To: dima@unixfreak.org Cc: ru@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/talkd announce.c From: Hajimu UMEMOTO In-Reply-To: <20010713165700.BDE8A3E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org> References: <20010713165700.BDE8A3E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org> X-Mailer: xcite1.38> Mew version 1.95b119 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjJWMWMbKEIp?= X-PGP-Public-Key: http://www.imasy.org/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 0C 53 FC 5D D0 37 91 05 D0 B3 EF 36 9B 6A BC X-URL: http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:57:00 -0700 >>>>> Dima Dorfman said: dima> I did think about that when writing that code (I like the new dima> interface so much better than the crufty old one), but talk assumes dima> IPv4 so much that it really doesn't matter, and deviating from that dima> here only leads to inconsistency. I doubt talk works over IPv6, and dima> looking at /usr/include/protocols/talkd.h, I don't think it's trivial dima> (if possible) to make it work over IPv6 without breaking backwards dima> comaptibility. Perhaps a talk6 is in order? Yup, I forgot that talk is heavily depend on IPv4 and it's hard to support IPv6. So, talk is exception. In anyway, I believe reducing the code which is depending to address family is good. Someone may try to support IPv6 in the future. -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message