From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 1 17:47:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7767D106566B for ; Tue, 1 May 2012 17:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397148FC16 for ; Tue, 1 May 2012 17:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so7274690obc.13 for ; Tue, 01 May 2012 10:47:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BYr7miUm8OK3PsUHaAmKzhsZuX3LLB7BizDqkzUkOxQ=; b=vx4nMEvYHYWfOENVi6kG/8/2AWZiH3Z1pRlZNW8WaVZMk7M9zcFjT8tlw8oRTZyMNK wTzYo8t9S+nVyhW7Ahsv45CZFa3KRwrGxCQECNrY02aTY9sf0Twqc4VVOjhN7IzGShQ4 ikx/B7a664POfh5RA1oQvEubrTmHIUz/8GTxlFUXz1ci/sapk8ytZHClZQI2ELKvka46 TSdIxDd4w01+aEfIWtbW7dY52j5Zqmg/IiErBnP+woTMSz894WFIe9EELgYbl3Ly2ZZp MeVGuXz5d8YIjeJoKaVN1s799UjaT3FDTnpgdHwalKTb65vozrBh3BMGIaQ7pfjzUwkc L0Ag== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.9.232 with SMTP id d8mr6645781oeb.66.1335894429833; Tue, 01 May 2012 10:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.166.100 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2012 10:47:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201204251241.04752.zec@fer.hr> <87vckg84gk.fsf@alien8.de> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 20:47:09 +0300 Message-ID: From: Sami Halabi To: Jack Vogel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Julian Stecklina Subject: Re: Intel 10 GbE cards (ixgbe) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 17:47:10 -0000 x540has no fbsd driver Sami On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual > tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I > would always > go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet being > used as much yet. > > Jack > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > > Thus spake Marko Zec : > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599 > > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as > officially > > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based > > cards > > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? > > > > We recently bought one: > > > > ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' > > class = network > > subclass = ethernet > > ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' > > class = network > > subclass = ethernet > > > > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any > > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is stable? > > > > Regards, Julian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert