Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 May 2012 20:47:09 +0300
From:      Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com>
To:        Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Julian Stecklina <js@alien8.de>
Subject:   Re: Intel 10 GbE cards (ixgbe)
Message-ID:  <CAEW%2BogZb2T48L0GKfKqciXxt0o2CjxjpreGYDcqyHMBOKKoZ%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFOYbc=srg0GiMv=Gf79b9BbxHawEZpFrG=pXb5s2BUZqwCVTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201204251241.04752.zec@fer.hr> <87vckg84gk.fsf@alien8.de> <CAFOYbc=srg0GiMv=Gf79b9BbxHawEZpFrG=pXb5s2BUZqwCVTQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
x540has no fbsd driver

Sami

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote:

> The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual
> tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I
> would always
> go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet being
> used as much yet.
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina <js@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> > Thus spake Marko Zec <zec@fer.hr>:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599
> > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as
> officially
> > > supported.  Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based
> > cards
> > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)?
> >
> > We recently bought one:
> >
> > ix0@pci0:34:0:0:        class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086
> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
> >    vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
> >    device     = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection'
> >    class      = network
> >    subclass   = ethernet
> > ix1@pci0:34:0:1:        class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086
> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
> >    vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
> >    device     = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection'
> >    class      = network
> >    subclass   = ethernet
> >
> > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any
> > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is stable?
> >
> > Regards, Julian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> >
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



-- 
Sami Halabi
Information Systems Engineer
NMS Projects Expert



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEW%2BogZb2T48L0GKfKqciXxt0o2CjxjpreGYDcqyHMBOKKoZ%2BQ>