From owner-cvs-all Sun Mar 3 21:34:20 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5354837B400; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 1F937AE216; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:34:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:34:15 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: murray@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/forth loader.conf src/sys/conf majors src/sys/dev/usb FILES dsbr100io.h ufm.c src/sys/i386/conf LINT src/sys/modules Makefile src/sys/modules/ufm Makefile Message-ID: <20020304053415.GB77980@elvis.mu.org> References: <200203040401.g2441a437897@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020304041431.GJ3250@freebsdmall.com> <20020304041906.GA77980@elvis.mu.org> <20020303.221529.82588733.imp@village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020303.221529.82588733.imp@village.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * M. Warner Losh [020303 21:16] wrote: > In message: <20020304041906.GA77980@elvis.mu.org> > Alfred Perlstein writes: > : * Murray Stokely [020303 20:15] wrote: > : > > : > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:01:36PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > : > > alfred 2002/03/03 20:01:36 PST > : > > > : > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > : > > : > Was the insta-MFC really necessary for this? Isn't it just as easy > : > to let it sit in -CURRENT for a week or two and allow others to look > : > through the code? > : > : As if anyone would... you're such the optimist Murray. :) > : > : It's not hooked into GENERIC so it shouldn't bite anyone. Afaik > : David has tested this in -stable so it should be ok. > > I wrote it for -stable and -current. I don't think David wrote this > driver. I was holding off checking it in because the NetBSD one was > better. Did you explain it to him that way? David explained to me that you had indicated that you didn't have the time to check it in. Perhaps if you had explained it to him in this manner he wouldn't have bugged me about it. If you did explain it like that to him that would be upsetting that he chose to go around you via me. He also forwarded me a message where all you had to say about it was that he was missing an entry for the MAKEDEV script, not that you had any other major reservations about it. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message